Scientists say warm weather is unlikely to greatly hamper the spread of coronavirus, dashing the hopes of many — including Donald Trump — ...
Scientists say warm weather is unlikely to greatly hamper the spread of coronavirus, dashing the hopes of many — including Donald Trump — who had suggested summer could provide relief from the global pandemic.
Researchers in Canada examined the spread of Covid-19 around the world in late March in places with different humidities, latitudes and public health measures, such as social distancing.
Dr Peter Juni, of the University of Toronto, said in a press release that the team found little or no link between infection spread and temperature or latitude, and only a weak association with humidity.
“We had conducted a preliminary study that suggested both latitude and temperature could play a role. But when we repeated the study under much more rigorous conditions, we got the opposite result,” he said.
By contrast, school closures and other public health measures had been an effective curb on coronavirus, Dr Juni added. “Our results are of immediate relevance as many countries, and some Canadian provinces and territories, are considering easing or removing some of these public health interventions.”
“Seasonality is likely to play only a minor role in the epidemiology of Covid-19,” the study concluded.
Mr Trump is pushing hard to “re-open” his country in order to boost the economy — whose performance he has made central to his 2020 election campaign. He has previously suggested that warm weather will see coronavirus “disappear”.
In Britain, Boris Johnson is to announce on Sunday how he plans to ease the lockdown, though ministers have warned that any early steps will be minor. The UK’s chief scientific adviser, Sir Patrick Vallance, has also speculated that the virus may spread less aggressively in the heat.
Professor Dionne Gesink, an epidemiologist from the University of Toronto and a co-author of the study, said in the release: “Summer is not going to make this go away. It’s important people know that. On the other hand, the more public health interventions an area had in place, the bigger the impact on slowing the epidemic growth.”
The authors studied 144 regions around the world, including states in the US, Australia and Canada. They estimated epidemic growth by comparing the number of cases on March 27 with the figure from a week prior, and with a string of variables during an “exposure period” between 7 and 13 March.
Some countries were not studied. The scientists wrote: “China was excluded as its epidemic growth had decelerated and the outbreak appeared to be contained. South Korea, Italy and Iran were excluded as their epidemics were fully established, being further ahead on the epidemic curve than the rest of the world, with the possibility of reaching the hyperendemic state during the follow-up period.”
The authors noted a number of limitations in their study, first among which was that “because of considerable differences in testing practices between different geopolitical areas, actual rates of Covid-19 could not be reliably estimated”. Their research is just the latest to examine the links between disease spread and weather, and was published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal.
In April, a review of the available evidence by US experts found that summer weather was unlikely to have an effect on coronavirus’ spread. However, in March, another paper found the opposite.
No comments